The Innoson EFCC arrest is more complicated than you think

by Ifedayo Adeleye

So much is being said of the arrest of Innoson Boss, Innocent Chukwuma, yet there has been very little or no solid information on the matter. As a result, a lot of what is being spread in the news and on social media are riddled with falsehood. Here, for example, are 5 myths about the Innoson saga.

First Myth: The Stolen 700 Million Naira.

Many on social media and elsewhere have been quick to spread the story that GTB stole 700 million from Innoson. Research shows this to be wholly false. In fact, nowhere is the sum of 700 million Naira even mentioned in the Innoson case. What is actually the case is that after being found culpable of forgery and other fraudulent crimes by the police, Innoson approached the Bank and pleaded for debt forgiveness. The bank, out of goodwill, accepted his plea and agreed to forego the sum of N559,374,072.09 which represented default charges that have accrued on the account.

Innoson also promised to pay back, within 30 days, the sum of N1,095,107,822.95 as full and final payment of his indebtedness to the Bank. Instead of honouring this agreement, Innoson filed a new case at the Federal High Court, Awka, claiming that the bank had debited his account with N559,374,072.09, the exact sum that the bank had forgiven him in default charges. He has continued ever since, to claim falsely that the bank owes him.

Second Myth: Ethnic biases motivated both parties

Many are also spreading rumours that the case against Innoson is tribalistic. This is a dangerously false narrative. The case against Innoson has nothing to do with where he comes from; it is simply a case of a debtor, in this case, Innoson, trying to avoid repaying the money he borrowed and trying to evade the case of forgery against him. It begs common sense to assume that a bank, in this case, GTB, which was not be accused of tribalism when it gave Innoson the loan, would now be accused of such now that it is trying to recover funds. These funds, by the way, are owned by customers, many of whom undoubtedly are of the same tribe as Innoson.

Third Myth: The Saga is Political

Some have tried to link the Innoson Saga to politics, but the fact of the matter is that it is entirely about business and breach of trust. It is important to note that the case between GTB and Innoson began more than seven years ago, that is, before the ruling APC was even formed as a political party.

To give a little background on the matter, GTB loaned Innoson N2.4 billion in 2009 to import spare parts for his company. Under the loan terms, GTBank was the exclusive owner of the Imported Goods. The condition in the agreement between the Bank and Innoson, for the release of the Imported Goods by the Bank to Innoson, was the payment of 25 percent of the value of each Letter of Credit transaction by Innoson. Later, Innoson approached the Bank requesting the release of the shipping documents without payment of the agreed 25 percent. The Bank declined his request as a result of Innoson’s failure to meet the agreed conditions. Innoson then fraudulently cleared all the imported Goods by forging the signatures of 4 (four) staff of the Bank as well as the Bank’s stamp on all the shipping documents.

The Bank reported the matter to the Nigeria Police, and the police confirmed that Innoson deliberately set out to defraud, steal from the Bank. And this brings us to the fourth myth of the saga, which is that the case is a civil matter.

 Fourth Myth: It is a Civil Case

Another claim out there is that the Innoson case is a civil matter which neither the EFCC nor the Police should get involved. Again, this is false. The Innoson saga is a criminal matter because he has been found culpable by the police of deliberately setting out to defraud, steal from the Bank and convert the Imported Goods belonging to the Bank by deceptive means and through forgery and misrepresentation. On October 12, 2017, the Police through its Charge No. FHC/L/565C/2015- filed an application for the issuance of bench warrant against Innocent Chukwuma; Charles Chukwuma and Annajekwu Sunny for fraudulent clearance of goods, forgery, conversion, stealing and conspiracy presently pending before Faji J, at the Federal High Court, Ikoyi and adjourned to December 8, 2017, for arraignment/or hearing of motion.

To further stall the criminal proceedings against him and the Bank’s bid to recover its funds, Innoson has been trying to distract the Bank from focusing on the criminal action, as well as civil actions filed for recovery of the debt. This includes propagating false and inciteful stories against the bank through frivolous and outrageous claims.

People, use your senses: How many people are employed by GTB?

How many people are employed by Innoson?

Before you close your account in GTB, do your math, you could be sending your relation and friends into the unemployment market.

Unfortunately, Ndi Igbo, are the ones championing this battle, I hope when GTB retrenches or downsizes, we will not hear of marginalisation or tribalism.

How many of those chanting anti-GTB slogans have an Innoson car?

Why don’t they start a campaign to make Innoson official cars of all South East Governors?

Do not cut your nose to spite your face.

The best way to support Innoson is not to cut close your GTB account. If you do that you will be sending thousands of Ndi Igbo into unemployment. If you really want to support Innoson, stand up, leave Facebook and go and buy an Innoson car. That way you will be giving him more money to battle his case at EFCC. My people, support with your heads.

One comment

  1. Is author not propagating myth?
    Question #1
    “First Myth: The Stolen 700 Million Naira.”
    If this is a myth, what case did GTB lose at both FHC and Appeal Court that necessitated an appeal to the SC? Until SC makes a pronouncement it is premature to call this a myth.
    Question #2
    “Second Myth: Ethnic biases motivated both parties.
    Many are also spreading rumours that the case against Innoson is tribalistic”

    How did the author arrive at this conclusion? He has failed to separate the feud between GTB and Innoson from the treatment of Innoson by EFCC. Perception may not be reality but at times perception can be a powerful motivating factor. To the best of my knowledge it is the treatment of EFCC that has been given an ethnic slant. Many have asked the question- suppose Dangote is accused of an infringement will EFCC fly him in shorts and singlet to any destination? The EFCC is wrong to humiliate any Nigerian based on a yet to be investigated suspicion. It is noteworthy that EFCC justified its action on the grounds that Innoson jumped bail. Now that Innoson has denied receiving any invitation from EFCC, the onus lies on EFCC to furnish a proof to the public.
    Question #3
    “Third Myth: The Saga is Political”
    Who says that the saga is political? Does Innoson belong to any political party?
    Question #4
    “Fourth Myth: It is a Civil Case”
    Is the author not confusing issues?
    Since the Police has an on-going case before Justice Faji J, at the Federal High Court, Ikoyi, what has EFCC got to do at this stage with apparently the same allegation? In the alternative, is EFCC investigating a different allegation? Will the author and EFCC throw more light on this?

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

cool good eh love2 cute confused notgood numb disgusting fail